07020 Forums  

Go Back   07020 Forums > Politics > State & National Politics > OPRA

OPRA NJ Open Public Records Act

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2017, 03:43 PM
prattjus prattjus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edgewater, NJ, USA
Posts: 531
prattjus is on a distinguished road
Appellate Division: Release that settled lawsuit is disclosable when settlement terms

Are lawsuit settlement agreement subject to disclosure when the settlement terms are first hammered out and agreed to by the parties or can agencies suppress settlement information until all the paperwork is signed, sealed and delivered? This is an important question because weeks or sometimes months elapse between a lawsuit's parties' informal--yet binding--agreement to settle and the signing of a formal agreement by all parties. During those weeks or months, many public agencies deny access to settlement agreements thus depriving the public of important settlement information.

The case law on this issue has so far has been mixed. Judges in Essex, Hudson and Passaic Counties have ruled that agencies must disclose settlement agreements as soon as the settlement's essential terms have been agreed to and reduced to writing. (William Paterson University, however, has appealed the Passaic County judge's ruling and that appeal remains pending.) But, a judge in Mercer County has reached the opposite conclusion.

Today, an Appellate Division panel has come out on the site of early release.

On November 15, 2017, a two-judge Appellate Division panel issued an unpublished (and thus non-precedential) opinion holding that a release that settled a lawsuit was final and required to be disclosed to an Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requestor when "the terms of the settlement were agreed to between the attorneys for the respective parties" even though "the stipulations of dismissal were not filed and the settlement checks were not delivered until after" the parties' attorneys came to their agreement. The panel also said that releases and settlement agreements that settle lawsuits are "contracts" which must be made "immediately available" in accordance with N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(e).

The opinion reversed a Final Agency Decision of the Government Records Council (GRC).








More...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Appellate Division rebuffs OPRA requestor's Declaratory Judgment Act lawsuit. prattjus OPRA 0 06-14-2017 12:53 PM
Hudson judge rules that draft settlement agreement is disclosable under OPRA. prattjus OPRA 0 11-13-2016 06:08 PM
OPRA lawsuit seeks nature of conduct underlying harassment complaints and terms of se prattjus OPRA 0 06-09-2016 11:51 PM
Appeal taken from GRC's ruling that settlement agreement was not disclosable even tho prattjus OPRA 0 03-13-2016 01:26 PM
OPRA Loss in Appellate Division prattjus OPRA 0 08-27-2013 12:24 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 07020.com - All rights reserved