07020 Forums  

Go Back   07020 Forums > Politics > State & National Politics > OPRA

OPRA NJ Open Public Records Act

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2017, 01:21 PM
prattjus prattjus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edgewater, NJ, USA
Posts: 531
prattjus is on a distinguished road
Appellate Division: Local Finance Board lacked quorum to decide ethics matter.

In a November 14, 2017 unpublished (and thus non-precedential) opinion, a three-judge panel of the Appellate Division ruled that four members of the eight-member Local Finance Board (LFB) were not statutorily authorized to rule on a Local Government Ethics Law (LGEL) complaint against a Franklin Township (Somerset County) Fire Commissioner.

According to the opinion and a January 13, 2016 LFB decision, the Franklin Township Ethics Board ruled in 2011 that Fire District 1 Commissioner James Wickman violated the LGEL by voting "to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed [in 2009] against the Commissioners of Franklin Township Fire District No. 1 in which he was also an individually-named defendant." The LFB reversed the Franklin Ethics Board's determination and vacated a $250 fine it had levied against Wickman. The LFB found that "Wickman's limited involvement in the underlying sexual harassment litigation did not rise to the level of a direct or indirect financial or personal involvement that might reasonably be expected to impair his objectivity or independence of judgment [and] that Wickman did not use or attempt to use his official position to secure an unwarranted privilege or advantage for himself."

Jeff Carter, a Franklin Township resident and brother of the woman who filed the underlying sexual harassment lawsuit, appealed the LFB's decision to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Division found that N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 required that LFB decisions "shall be made by no less than two-thirds of all members of the [B]oard." Accordingly, the panel ruled, "at least six of the Board's eight statutorily-commanded members had to participate in the decision it rendered in this case." Since only four members were present to vote, the Appellate Division found that "the decision is void," vacated it and remanded the matter back to the LFB for further proceedings.


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Appellate Division to rule on school board's closed session minutes redaction case. prattjus OPRA 0 10-05-2016 04:08 PM
Local Finance Board adjudicates some ethics cases. prattjus OPRA 0 08-07-2015 01:07 PM
Local Finance Board releases list of 2,632 local government officers who received vio prattjus OPRA 0 08-06-2015 12:58 PM
Local Finance Board adjudicates some ethics cases. prattjus OPRA 0 07-14-2015 05:20 AM
My comments regarding the rule proposal by New Jersey's Local Finance Board prattjus OPRA 0 11-15-2013 10:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 07020.com - All rights reserved