07020 Forums  

Go Back   07020 Forums > Politics > State & National Politics > OPRA

OPRA NJ Open Public Records Act

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2017, 01:57 PM
prattjus prattjus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edgewater, NJ, USA
Posts: 503
prattjus is on a distinguished road
GRC calls Kean U.'s 18 extensions seeking a total of 170 days to respond to an OPRA "

The Government Records Council (GRC) is usually very accommodating to custodians who do not grant or deny records within the Open Public Record Act's (OPRA) seven business-day response period, as long as the custodian seeks an extension within that seven business-day period.

So, if a custodian, on the sixth business day after an OPRA request is received, requests an extension to reasonably close, certain date, the GRC will typically find that the custodian complied with the seven business-day requirement. Unfortunately, some public agencies, the Division of State Police, for example, frequently (if not always) request extensions thereby reducing OPRA's seven business-day response to a near nullity.

There are, however, limits to the number and duration of OPRA extensions. In the GRC's December 13, 2016 decision in Luis Rodriguez v. Kean University, the Council's executive director wrote that "[a]lthough extensions are rooted in well-settled case law, the Council need not unquestioningly find valid every request for an extension containing a clear deadline." He also wrote that the GRC has held in the past that a "custodian could not lawfully exploit the process by repeatedly rolling over an extension once obtained."

According to the GRC's executive Director's Findings and Recommendations, the Council analyzes extension requests on what is "reasonably necessary." In order to make that determination, the Council goes through a three-step process. First, it looks at "complexity of the request as measured by the number of items requested, the ease in identifying and retrieving requested records, and the nature and extent of any necessary redactions." Second, it considers the amount of time that the custodian has already had to respond to the request. Finally, it considers any extenuating circumstances that would hinder the custodian's ability to respond.

Applying these considerations to Rodriguez's request to Kean University, the executive director found that Kean's eighteen extension requests that added up to 170 days to turn over 435 pages of material "was clearly excessive and flies in the face of OPRA's mandate to 'promptly comply' with a records request."


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinion: GRC should be able to award OPRA attorney fees without help from an administ prattjus OPRA 0 10-30-2016 11:19 AM
OPRA lawsuit seeks Use of Force Reports filed by officers who "struggled" with "belli prattjus OPRA 0 10-10-2016 04:03 AM
Two OPRA cases seeking draft settlement agreements and correspondence to be heard thi prattjus OPRA 0 09-06-2016 11:00 PM
OPRA's "immediate access" provision tested in GRC filing. prattjus OPRA 0 02-19-2016 12:10 PM
Stafford claims OPRA suit is "frivolous" and brought in "bad faith" to "harass the To prattjus OPRA 0 04-07-2015 01:23 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 07020.com - All rights reserved