07020 Forums  

Go Back   07020 Forums > Politics > State & National Politics > OPRA

OPRA NJ Open Public Records Act

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2017, 09:58 AM
prattjus prattjus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edgewater, NJ, USA
Posts: 516
prattjus is on a distinguished road
Three-judge panel split 2-1 on whether police dash-cam video is available under OPRA.

On August 28, 2017, two judges out a three-judge Appellate Division panel issued a non-precedential opinion granting a Lakewood resident access to a police dash-cam video of an August 31, 2013 traffic stop that resulted in the arrest and indictment of a Lakewood police officer. One judge, however, filed a dissenting opinion that argued that the recording was a "criminal investigatory record" and thus exempt from disclosure.

The case is similar to Paff v. Ocean County Prosecutor's Office. There, as in today's case, the decision turned on whether a local police directive requiring the video to be recorded satisfied the "not required by law" prong of the criminal investigatory record exemption. Under OPRA, a record cannot be exempt as a criminal investigatory record if it is required by law to be made. Judges Ellen Koblitz and Thomas W. Sumners ruled that a Lakewood police directive that required dash-cam filming off all traffic stops was a "law" that removed the videos from the criminal investigatory record exemption. Judge Susan L. Reisner disagreed and wrote a dissenting opinion.

The issue of whether a local police directive satisfies the "law" requirement is under consideration of the New Jersey Supreme Court which is presently reviewing the Paff matter.

Beside the dash-cam issue, all three judges agreed that the sufficiency of the information contained in the prosecutor's press release regarding the Lakewood officer's arrest should be remanded to the trial court. All three judges also agreed that the trial court should examine whether police reports of the incident should have been released, whether the video is disclosable under the common law right of access and whether attorney fees issued to the plaintiff in the case should be recalculated.

Walter M. Luers of Clinton is the plaintiff's attorney.


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hunterdon judge orders disclosure of police dash-cam video, denies OPRA requestor's a prattjus OPRA 0 03-29-2017 03:32 PM
Middlesex judge orders release of police dash-cam video. prattjus OPRA 0 11-07-2016 09:14 AM
Appellate Division, in a two to one vote, affirms disclosure of police dash-cam video prattjus OPRA 0 06-30-2016 10:03 AM
Middlesex Judge grants access to police dash cam recordings. prattjus OPRA 0 05-11-2015 10:18 AM
New OPRA lawsuit seeks police dashcam video prattjus OPRA 0 02-22-2015 02:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 07020.com - All rights reserved