07020 Forums  

Go Back   07020 Forums > Politics > State & National Politics > OPRA

OPRA NJ Open Public Records Act

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2017, 10:45 AM
prattjus prattjus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edgewater, NJ, USA
Posts: 489
prattjus is on a distinguished road
Bergen judge rebuffs Teaneck's bid to bar "abusive and excessive" OPRA requests.

In his March 9, 2017 opinion, Bergen County Superior Court Judge Robert P. Contillo rejected Teaneck Township's attempt to bar future Open Public Records Act (OPRA) requests from a man who made 380 requests in a two-month period. The judge also denied Teaneck's bid to require the man to pay "extraordinary handling fees" and to relieve it from processing those requests.

According to the opinion, Elie C. Jones filed "an avalanche" of OPRA requests soon after the Township rejected a $10,000 settlement demand Jones had made to resolve his lawsuit against a Teaneck law enforcement officer. Judge Contillo noted that under the circumstances, "it is easy to under the Township's frustration." Still, he found that "OPRA requests--even those designed and timed to bludgeon a municipality into a financial settlement--cause no immediate or irreparable harm." A showing of such harm is required before an injunction can be issued.

The judge noted that Teaneck is "not powerless" and that OPRA provides remedies for public entities facing an enormous number of requests. One remedy contained in N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(g) permits the Township to deny requests that "substantially disrupt agency operations" if the requestor refuses the Township's attempts to reach a solution that would accommodate both it and the requestor. For example, the Township could have requested that Jones prioritize his requests and assess a special service charge for the extraordinary amount of time it would take to fulfill them. Since the lawsuit was filed, Jones had abandoned 290 of his 380 requests, which Judge Contillo found undermined the Township's argument for an injunction.

Judge Contillo also denied the Township's request that the court "assess a special handling fee" because "it is not for the court to assess the fee." Rather, OPRA requires the Township to assess the fee leaving the requestor with the option to pay the fee, challenge it in court or abandon the request.

The court also wrote that if Township officials felt that Jones' conduct constituted harassment, they could proceed against him under both the civil and criminal code.

Jones was represented in the matter by Walter M. Luers of Clinton.


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OPRA lawsuit seeks Use of Force Reports filed by officers who "struggled" with "belli prattjus OPRA 0 10-10-2016 04:03 AM
Stafford claims OPRA suit is "frivolous" and brought in "bad faith" to "harass the To prattjus OPRA 0 04-07-2015 01:23 PM
Following up on: Publishing the "amount" of no-bid government contracts prattjus OPRA 0 04-03-2014 11:30 AM
Judge orders disclosure of most information in Warren "Generator-Gate" case. prattjus OPRA 0 12-20-2013 12:51 PM
Publishing the "amount" of no-bid government contracts prattjus OPRA 0 12-23-2012 02:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 07020.com - All rights reserved